国产自拍👅_亚洲 欧洲 日韩 图片 视频 一区 二区_.手.动.输.入.网.址.联.系.客.服.人.员.lanan_shell
XI. FOOTNOTES 1 Captain Dave Haase, ALPA Ground Proximity Warning System Survey, Attachment 6 (ANC Task No. OPS-9013: Review of the provisions on ground proximity warning systems in Annex 6, Parts I and II, ICAO, Air Navigation Commission). November 2, 1992, Attachment 6, Appendix C, p. F-6. 2 Ibid., p. F-6. 3 Ibid., p. F-7. 4 Safety Study, Human Factors Issues in Controlled Flight into Terrain (CFIT) Accidents, 1984-1994 (draft). ICAO, September, 1994, unpaginated. 5 R. Khatwa and A. L. C. Roelen, An Analysis of Controlled Flight into Terrain (CFIT) Accidents of Commercial Operators 1988 Through 1994. National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, The Netherlands, February, 1996, p. 46. Page 34 This page intentionally left blank Page 35 XII. APPENDICES Page 36 This page intentionally left blank Page 37 Appendix A CFIT Joint Safety Analysis Team (JSAT) Charter I Purpose: To review and analyze data and make coordinated recommendations to enhance commercial aviation safety. II Background: Industry (ISST) and FAA have agreed to work together to identify and implement a data driven, benefit focused, safety enhancement program designed to continuously improve our safe commercial aviation system. The FAA and ISST have further agreed that cooperatively and selectively pursuing the critical few high leveraged safety intervention strategies will maximize the safety benefit to the flying public through a focused application of industry and FAA resources. To achieve this goal, the FAA and ISST have agreed to charter a working group. III Task: A. The team shall acquire publicly available data, including prior studies and analyses. This will constitute the beginning point for review and analysis. B. The team shall develop, document, and utilize an analytical process to develop recommended safety intervention strategies. The process developed by the team should include “appropriate levels” of causal analysis to substantiate the effectiveness of recommended data driven intervention strategies. In addition to documenting its safety analysis process, analysis results, and recommended intervention strategies, the team shall define its assumptions regarding the amount and extent of data considered (fleet size, time frame, etc.). IV Products: The deliverables include reports to the FAA and industry documenting the team’s process, recommended safety intervention strategies and assumptions used in the analysis. V Membership: The initial team will include representatives with the appropriate technical background provided by industry and the FAA. VI Proof of Concept: To validate the partnership process, the team will review Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) data and present its findings and a recommendation on continuing joint analysis at an executive meeting of the ISST and FAA. Interim briefings to the ISST and FAA may be required to facilitate business planning. VII Resources: The signatories agree to provide the financial, logistic and personnel resources to carry out this charter. Page 38 Appendix B Data Set The following is a synopsis of the accidents that were used by the JSAT: 1. Buffalo Airways, Inc., Boeing 707-351C, April 13, 1987, Kansas City, Missouri Aircraft crashed approximately 3 nautical miles short of Runway 1 while conducting an Instrument Landing System (ILS) approach to that runway. All 4 occupants onboard the aircraft sustained fatal injuries. 2. Flying Tiger Line, Inc., Boeing 747-200, February 18, 1989, Kuala Lumpur Aircraft crashed while executing a Non-Directional Beacon (NDB) approach to Runway 33 at Subang Airport. The wreckage was located approximately 9 nautical miles southeast of Subang International Airport. All 4 occupants onboard the aircraft sustained fatal injuries. 3. Markair, Inc., Boeing 737-200, June 2, 1990, Unalakleet, Alaska Aircraft crashed approximately 7.5 nautical miles short of Runway 14 while executing a Localizer approach to that runway. Several minor injuries and one serious injury were sustained. 4. Alitalia AZ 404, Douglas DC-9-32, November 14, 1990, Zurich, Switzerland Aircraft crashed while executing an approach to Runway 14 at Zurich. The aircraft first impacted trees approximately 5.2 nautical miles from the runway threshold. The aircraft then impacted the surface of the wooded north face of the Stadlerbert. All 40 passengers and 6 crewmembers sustained fatal injuries. 5. Air Inter, Airbus A320, January 20, 1992, Strasbourg, France (Dropped due to lack of a published report) Aircraft crashed while executing a Variable Omni-range Radar (VOR) procedure approach to Runway 5 into Strasbourg. The wreckage was located www.aero.cn 航空翻译 www.aviation.cn 本文链接地址：航空资料34
